perform a generalization
Major Section: PROOF-CHECKER-COMMANDS
Example: (generalize ((and (true-listp x) (true-listp y)) 0) ((append x y) w))Generalize using the indicated substitution, which should be a non-empty list. Each element of that list should be a two-element list of the formGeneral Form: (generalize &rest substitution)
(term variable)
, where term
may use abbreviations.
The effect of the instruction is to replace each such term in the
current goal by the corresponding variable. This replacement is
carried out by a parallel substitution, outside-in in each
hypothesis and in the conclusion. More generally, actually, the
``variable'' (second) component of each pair may be nil
or a number,
which causes the system to generate a new name of the form _
or _n
,
with n
a natural number; more on this below. However, when a
variable is supplied, it must not occur in any goal of the current
proof-checker state.
When the ``variable'' above is nil
, the system will treat it as the
variable |_|
if that variable does not occur in any goal of the
current proof-checker state. Otherwise it treats it as |_0|
, or
|_1|
, or |_2|
, and so on, until one of these is not among the
variables of the current proof-checker state. If the ``variable''
is a non-negative integer n
, then the system treats it as |_n|
unless that variable already occurs among the current goals, in
which case it increments n just as above until it obtains a new
variable.
Note: The same variable may not occur as the variable component of
two different arguments (though nil
may occur arbitrarily many
times, as may a positive integer).